Monday, May 31, 2010
BP Oil Spill: More required reading and useful links
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Dumb clichés: Why I can't stand them
1 : a trite phrase or expression; also : the idea expressed by it 2 : a hackneyed theme, characterization, or situation 3 : something (as a menu item) that has become overly familiar or commonplace
— cliché adjective"
The all-time, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe world champions of using clichés are probably athletic coaches, and television talking heads who usually have little, to no idea what they are talking about to begin with. More often than not, when a phrase becomes cliché, it basically loses its meaning and becomes somewhat grating to listen to or read.
This is Tim Brewster, Minnesota Golden Gophers head coach, and public enemy #1 in using corny puns and clichés in his press conferences. So bad, I used a cliché to describe his status in this category.
One example that especially annoys me is "Give it 110%." Right off the bat, you, as a person, are the sum of what you are, and nothing more. Sorry if you feel special, but that's the grim reality of life. That being said, if you are demanding that everyone give more than 100%, and lets assume this is possible, then wouldn't the law of averages make "giving it 110%" average? It would. Furthermore, imagine if you went into the bathroom and filled your tub up with 110% of water, better yet, go try that out. Then have fun cleaning up the enormous mess you just made. It's really a nonsense statement, and ought to be avoided. The only time "110%" should ever be described in any way is when you are discussing interest on a loan, profits, degrees of angles and breast augmentations. That's it.
Another cliché I can't stand is "It's just like [insert noun], ON STEROIDS!" This one, in my experience, is probably the most annoying. Perhaps it's on account of my experience in the fitness industry, but nevertheless, it really is a ridiculous statement. Culturally, steroids are pretty widely regarded as a bad thing. So when you exclaim that your product, idea or concept is just like something else, only "on steroids," it denotes a positive connotation. Uh oh! Now we have a double standard. So if the idea of steroids is such a terrible thing, why would you compliment something by describing it as being on steroids? For example, if I described former Pittsburgh Steeler Jerome Bettis as, "He's just like John Riggins, on steroids!" The intention of the statement is positive, because I am indicating he is better than John Riggins. However, taken literally, I have indicated that Bettis is better than Riggins because he is on steroids. The meaning becomes debased and I have slandered Mr. Bettis. For the record, I am not indicating in any way whatsoever Bettis took anything other than other people's pride when he ran over them. Even when describing a product or concept, what are you really saying? A more effective way of saying the same thing is, "We took the concept of the cheeseburger, and made it better than it was before!" Now you have made a more poignant literal statement, and managed to sneak in a very subtle 6-Million Dollar Man reference.
Now these are just two clichés that I really dislike. There are many more just like them, and equally silly. The real danger in a cliché as a writer, is that if you are not careful, one really bad usage of a cliché or idiom can ruin your artistic effort, or in business setting, just make you seem disingenuous or uncreative. So be on the lookout for bad writing in the form of tired and worn out phrases.
This will probably end up being a series as I think of more items I can rant about. That being said, I am going to go give 100% on my thesis introduction in its third revision, and try to make it like the older one, only improved in key areas.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
The Bleeding Gulf
Unless you have been living in a cave, or have had your blinders on, you are probably aware of the massive oil spill infecting the Gulf of Mexico. Sunday, May 23, 2010
Gym etiquette: The final entry!
Saturday, May 22, 2010
The latest holdups
Friday, April 23, 2010
NFL Draft and Twitter: Who I'm following
NFL Draft, Day 2
- I still think the Tampa Bay Buccaneers should have taken Eric Berry. Either way, they still really needed a defensive tackle desperately so they answered a need and took, arguably, best player available depending on how you graded McCoy.
- So I was dead wrong about Oakland making a terrible pick. They truly surprised me by taking Alabama's middle linebacker Rolando McClain. They not only scooped up a legitimate Top 10 talent, it answers a major need with their recent switch to the 3-4 defense.
- Finally, I am actually happy with New Orleans' selection of Florida State's cornerback Patrick Robinson. He has great measurables, and is a veteran player for the now retired defensive coordinator Mickey Andrews, whose track record of producing great NFL talent is unquestionable. This is a very low risk, high upside pick for the Saints. I still wanted Jerry Hughes, but I guess the Colts just had to mess that up.
- Denver, have you lost your collective minds? They began the night looking like geniuses by trading down repeatedly. I even remarked, "looks like they are going for the Bill Walsh method." And then what did they do? Take a wide receiver that "reminds them of Brandon Marshall," their franchise wide receiver they just traded to Miami, and drafted Tim Tebow in one of the biggest non-Oakland-related first round reaches of the past decade. I had a feeling Tebow would sneak into the first, but not that soon. So I hope head coach Josh McDaniel has a brilliant press release ready to go.
- Way to go San Francisco! You needed some offensive linemen, and hit a home run. Great picks with one of the top rated tackles and guards to lead off their draft. They had the best draft of the first round, to Denver's worst .
